New York changed what a car accident case is worth this year, and four months later, the effects are showing up in who files, what gets litigated, and which MVA leads are still worth buying.
The changes arrived in Part EE of the FY2027 state budget (S9008-C / A10008-C). Governor Kathy Hochul announced the package on May 27, 2026, calling it “a win for every New Yorker who depends on a car.” The new rules apply to actions commenced on or after May 26, 2026, not to accidents that happen after that date. That detail matters more than any other for firms working a New York docket.
The state’s reason was cost. According to the Department of Financial Services, the average New York auto premium runs above $4,000 a year, roughly $1,500 more than the national average, and fraud adds up to $300 to each policy.
The changes that matter for MVA cases
The budget part covers more ground than the headlines suggest. These are the provisions that change how a motor vehicle accident case is screened, valued, and litigated:
| Change | What it does |
|---|---|
| 90/180 category deleted Insurance Law §5102(d) | Temporary injuries that kept someone from substantially all daily activities for 90 of the first 180 days no longer qualify as a “serious injury.” Eight categories remain, including fracture, permanent consequential limitation, and significant limitation of use. |
| Mostly-at-fault bar CPLR §1411(b) | A claimant whose fault is greater than the defendant’s (or the defendants’ combined) recovers nothing. It applies only to no-fault (Article 51) motor vehicle cases. Premises, product, and other negligence claims stay under pure comparative fault. |
| Fault-first trials Insurance Law §5104(a) | Juries decide liability first, then serious injury, then damages, which gives the defense an earlier exit before damages evidence is heard. |
| $100,000 non-economic cap Insurance Law §5104(d) | Pain-and-suffering damages are capped for claimants who were driving uninsured (lapses under 30 days excepted), or who were convicted of impaired driving or a felony tied to the crash. Economic damages and death cases are not capped. |
| Staged-accident liability expanded | Criminal exposure now reaches anyone who hires, requests, encourages, or orchestrates a staged accident, not just the driver. |
| Joint & several liability Did not pass | Repeal of CPLR §1602(6) was left out. Low-fault motor vehicle defendants can still be held jointly and severally liable for non-economic damages. |
Read the fault bar carefully. The statute says “greater than,” not “50% or more.” On the text, a claimant found exactly 50/50 is not barred. Expect that line, and how non-party fault is counted, to be argued on appeal.
What the first four months look like
Early reporting from the plaintiff and defense bars points in the same direction:
- A filing rush, then a pause. Firms rushed to file in late May to beat the new rules, then filed noticeably fewer cases in June and July as marginal files were re-evaluated, according to Lawyer Monthly.
- Fault became a motion. With a hard bar in place, fault is increasingly fought on summary judgment rather than left to a jury, and threshold defenses are now stacked on top of it.
- Evidence moved up the list. Event data recorders, dashcam footage, telematics, and phone records went from nice-to-have to case-deciding.
- Insurers were told to pass it on. On July 1, DFS directed auto insurers to build the reforms into all pending and future rate filings. Regulators pointed to Florida, where the 2023 reforms were followed by a 5.6% rate decrease and nearly $1 billion returned to 2.7 million policyholders.
What it means for MVA leads
The practical effect is simple to state: a New York car accident lead that qualified in April may be a case you would decline today. The claimant did not change. The law did. That puts the weight on screening before the case ever reaches your intake team.
- Grade the injury, not the complaint. Leads should be sorted by which §5102(d) category they can realistically meet, backed by imaging or objective findings. Soft-tissue claims that relied on 90/180 have lost their main path to pain and suffering.
- Screen fault at intake. Rear-end and clear-liability crashes hold their value. Multi-vehicle and disputed-fault files need a police report and a realistic fault read before anyone signs them.
- Ask about the claimant’s own coverage. An uninsured claimant now faces a $100,000 non-economic cap, which changes the value of the case even when liability is clean.
- There is no grandfathering by accident date. Because the trigger is the filing date, an unfiled case from a spring 2026 crash is litigated under the new rules. Older leads sitting in a CRM should be re-screened, not assumed.
- Know how your vendor sources cases. With staged-accident liability now reaching anyone who “encourages” one, runner-style sourcing and incentivized intake carry real risk. Claimant-initiated contact with a documented consent trail is the standard to hold vendors to.
We expect New York pricing to split. Threshold-qualified cases with clean liability should hold or gain value as they become scarcer, while high-volume soft-tissue inventory gets cheaper and harder to monetize. We rebuilt our own New York MVA leads screening around the remaining §5102(d) categories and the new fault bar for exactly that reason.
New York is not the only state moving
New York joins a run of states that have changed MVA case math in the last 18 months. Georgia’s SB 68 and SB 69 made seatbelt non-use admissible and limited medical damages to amounts actually paid for cases filed from April 21, 2025. Louisiana moved to a 51% bar for accidents on or after January 1, 2026. Texas went the other way when its “nuclear verdicts” bill, SB 30, died in 2025.
The triggers differ too. New York and Georgia key off the filing date, while Louisiana keys off the accident date, so two identical crashes can be litigated under different rules depending on the state and the calendar.
Crash volume is not the problem. The National Safety Council’s preliminary estimate puts first-half 2026 traffic deaths at 18,460, down just 2% from a year earlier, and the injury caseload behind that number is still enormous. What has changed is how much a given case is worth, and that now depends on the state it will be filed in. For firms buying cases, the lesson is to buy screening built for the state, whether that is unsigned MVA leads or signed MVA retainers.
Sources
- NY DFS: Governor Hochul Secures Reforms to Lower Auto Insurance Premiums (May 27, 2026)
- NY DFS: New Guidance to Implement Auto Insurance Reforms (July 1, 2026)
- JTNY: Hochul Tort Reform, What Passed & What Didn’t
- Hinshaw & Culbertson: New York’s Sweeping Motor Vehicle Tort Law Reforms
- Lawyer Monthly: New York’s 2026 Auto Tort Reform, One Summer In
- National Safety Council: Preliminary Motor Vehicle Death Estimates, First Half of 2026
This article is general information, not legal advice. Parts of the new statute are still being interpreted by New York courts. Take specific case questions to your own counsel.
Back to Blog